[This guest post was written by Amanda B. Slade, an associate in the Trademark Group at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.]. The USPTO refused registration of the mark BIKESTYLE, in ...
Chief Judge Roger has announced that two Interlocutory Attorneys at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board have been promoted to the position of Administrative Trademark Judge. In addition, a prominent ...
First Coast Energy opposed an application to register the mark DAILY FILL for "retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasoline," claiming a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark DAILY'S for the ...
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark WATER BABIES in the design form shown below, for various swimming instruction services, finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark WATERBABIES ...
The USPTO refused registration of the mark ASM ALL STAR MOTORSPORTS & Design (shown first below), for catalog and online auto parts services, finding a likelihood of confusion with the two ...
Trek Bicycle opposed an application to register the mark TREK & Design(shown below) for nut, grain, and dried fruit-based snack bars, alleging a likelihood of confusion with the registered marks TREK for ...
The Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark GNARLY MARLEY'S for various clothing items and for retail clothing and gift store services, finding the mark likely to ...
The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation on summary judgment, ruling that the USPTO's acceptance of an untimely Section 8 Declaration is not a ground for cancellation. Respondent Direct Impulse ...
The Board affirmed two refusals of the mark SOUTHFACE VILLAGE, in standard character and design form, for "providing an Internet portal offering information in the fields of real estate concerning ...
The USPTO refused registration of the mark NEW SILK ROAD for clothing, on the ground that the mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) because the goods are not primarily made of ...