LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • IP Blogs
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • IP Blogs
  • Contact

TTABlog Test: Is INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS Confusable With This Word+Design Mark for Chiropractic Services?

October 8, 2019October 10, 2019| in Uncategorized| by John L. Welch
The USPTO refused to register the mark INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS for, inter alia, chiropractic services [CARE SYSTEMS disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered word+design mark shown below, for chiropractic services. Applicant Donald Dudley appealed. Did Dudley do right? In re Donald Dudley, Serial No. 87655327 (October 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. Lynch).

Because the services are in part identical, the Board must presume that they travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of purchasers. These factors weighed “heavily” in favor of a finding of likelihood of confusion.

As to the cited mark, the Board found the top portion to be “dominant for a number of reasons.” It is the first part of the mark and is more likely to be impressed upon the minds of consumers and remembered. “The pictorial element occupies a prominent central place in the mark, and consists of a male silhouette reminiscent of Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man.” That element looks like the letter “I” and thus the top portion could be viewed as “VIP,” standing for VICTORY INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE. “So, VIP in this mark has a laudatory connotation about special treatment from the services, as well as the initialism connotation.”

Although the literal portion of a mark is normally accorded greater weight, here “the bold lettering VIP, incorporated with the prominent design features, forms the part of the mark most likely to be remembered by consumers and used to call for the services.” “In fact, some consumers could perceive the less prominent INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE, or VICTORY INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE, as a marketing slogan or tagline, rather than the primary identifier of source.

The Board also found the wording INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE that appears in both marks to be suggestive of the services: it suggests “the balance and unified functioning that patients may achieve through the services.”

The Board concluded that, considering the marks in their entireties, “the differences between the marks is dispositive of no likelihood of confusion, even though the services, channels of trade, and classes of consumers overlap.”

And so the Board reversed the refusal to register.

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlog comment: How did you do?

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2019.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

Precedential No. 8: TTAB Rejects Designation of Documents and Responses as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only”

Next

In 2019, How Often Did the TTAB Affirm Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals?


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2023 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web.