LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Come Out?

July 13, 2020August 17, 2020| in The TTABlog| by kerrycoughlin
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. Let’s see how you do with them, keeping in mind that last year the Board  affirmed, by my calculation, about 93% these refusals. Answer(s) will be found in the first comment.

In re World Economic Forum, Application Serial No. 79249902 (July 6, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [Mere descriptiveness refusal of 4IR for publications, consulting services, social networking services, and educational services. The Examining Attorney maintained that 4IR is a recognized abbreviation for “Fourth Industrial Revolution”].

In re Lifestyle Enterprises, Inc., Application Serial No. 87952218 (July 8, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. Adlin). [Mere descriptiveness refusal of DIVANY for “furniture,” Applicant argued, and the Board agreed, that the doctrine of foreign equivalents did not apply.]

In re Synergy One Lending, Inc., Serial No. 88063190 (July 10, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. Wellington). [Mere descriptiveness refusal of RETIREMENT FUNDING SOLUTIONS (in standard characters) for “Financial services, namely, mortgage lending services” [RETIREMENT FUNDING disclaimed]]. Applicant argued that taking out a mortgage is not “funding.”]

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlog comment: See any WYHAs here?

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2020.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

TTABlog Test: Which of these Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

Next

TTABlog Test: Is TEQUILUSA for Alcoholic Beverages Confusable with the TEQUILA Certification Mark?


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web.