Here are three very recent TTAB decisions in Section 2(d) appeals, decided on the same day. I’m not giving any hints, so you’re on your own. How do you think these appeals turned out? [Answer in first comment].

In re Tucker’s Trinkets & Treasures LLC, Serial No. 87627270 (August 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. Wellington). [Section 2(d) refusal of TUCKER’S TRINKETS & TREASURES (in standard characters, TRINKETS disclaimed) for “jewelry charms” in view of the registered mark TUCKER’S FINE JEWELRY & GIFT GALLERY (in standard characters, FINE JEWELRY & GIFT disclaimed) for “jewelry”].

In re Fredman Bros. Furniture Company, Inc., Serial No. 87567505 (August 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. Greenbaum). [Section 2(d) refusal of TEMPTEC for “Mattresses, mattress protector covers, pillows, and pillow protector covers” in view of the registered mark TEMPTEXX for “mattress topper”]

In re DCD IDID Enterprise, LLC , Serial No. 87465751 (August 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [Section 2(d)refusal of the mark ID.IGNITION SYSTEMS in standard characters (IGNITION SYSTEMS disclaimed) for “keyless entry system and keyless ignition switch system for retrofit installation into classic and hot rod automotive vehicles comprised of electric wire harnesses for automobiles, controller box in the nature of electrical controllers, microprocessor, electronic signal receiver, and keyfob with electronic signal transponder and button” in view of the registered mark I.D. SYSTEMS & Design (shown below) for “wireless transmitters and receivers for use with vehicles and other powered assets”].

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlog comment: How did you do? See any WYHAs?

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2019.