LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTABlog Quarterly Index: October – December 2018

January 3, 2019January 7, 2019| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch
Happy New Year! E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right (at https://www.ttablog@blogspot.com) to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the TTABlog on Twitter: @TTABlog.

Section 2(d) – Likelihood of Confusion:

  • TTABlog Test: Are Cell Phone Covers Related to Sunglasses Under Section 2(d)? [No]
  • TTABlog Test: Is “T MARK” Confusable With “TJ MARC & Design” for Jewelry? [Yes]
  • Finding Confusion and Dilution Likely, TTAB Sustains AMERICAN EXPRESS Oppositions to AMERIXPRESS
  • TTAB Finds SEAHORSE JAPANESE CUISINE, in Chinese Characters, Confusable With SEAHORSE for Restaurant/Bar Services
  • TTAB Finds “THUNDER” Weak, Dismisses THUNDERBIRD Wine Opposition to THUNDER ROAD for Moonshine and Whiskey
  • TTAB Test: Is SNAP FUNNEL Confusable with SNAP & POUR for Funnels? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is DE BEERS TRUE BRILLIANT Confusable With TRU BRILLIANCE for Jewelry? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is VIA SAINT JACQUES for Alsacian Wine Confusable with JACQUIN for Other Alcoholic Beverages? [No]
  • TTAB Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?
  • TTAB Test: Is RICHARD RAWLINGS’ GARAGE Confusable With RAWLINGS for Clothing? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is MISEL DISEL Confusable with DIESEL for Pre-Shave Liquids? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is COCOON BY SEALY Confusable With SLEEP COCOON for Mattresses and Pillows? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is SONIA for Sauces Confusable with SONIA SONI LIFE IS A RECIPE for Spices? [Yes]
  • Three Section 2(d) TTAB Cases: How Do You Think They Came Out?
  • Twin TTAB Test: Is ALLEN HOTEL Confusable With ETHAN ALLEN for Lodging Services? Is it Geographically Descriptive? [No]
  • TTAB Grants Section 2(d) Petition for Cancellation Despite 20 Years of Concurrent Use Without Confusion
  • ABBY & Hippo Design for Plush Toys Confusable with ABBY for Dolls, Says TTAB
  • TTAB Dismisses SUPERCORE Opposition: No Likelihood of Confusion with U-CORE and No Intent to Deceive in Misuse of the “R” Symbol
  • TTAB Test: Is “I.W. SUISSE” Confusable with the SWISS Certification Mark, Both for Watches? [Yes]
  • WYHA? DIAMONDS ON THE ROCKS Confusable With SILVER ON THE ROCKS for Jewelry, Says TTAB
  • Precedential No. 32: Giving “Great Weight” to Two Consent Agreements, TTAB Reverses Section 2(d) Refusal of AMERICAN CONSTELLATION for Cruise Ship Services
  • TTAB Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?

Section 2(e)(1) – Mere Descriptiveness:

  • TTAB Test: Is ULTIMATE GEL Merely Descriptive of Bedding Products?
  • TTAB Test: Is “OVER THE FLOOR” Merely Descriptive of Rugs and Mats? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is ATHLETE INTELLIGENCE Merely Descriptive of Wearable Monitoring Devices? [Yes]
  • TTAB Finds Photo of Grumpy Cat Merely Descriptive of Grumpy Cat-Related Goods and Services
  • TTAB Test: Is “S&M” Merely Descriptive of Sex Therapy Services? [Yes]
  • TTAB Test: Is YAMSAFER (Arabic) Merely Descriptive of Travel Agency Services? [Yes}
  • Precedential No. 31: Applying Equivalents, TTAB Finds Greek Word “GÁMOS” Merely Descriptive of Jewelry
  • WYHA? TTAB Affirmed 2(e)(1) Refusal of ICE BLIND as Merely Descriptive of Ice Fishing Houses
  • TTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of “KING” in KING LIVING & Design for Furniture and Bed-Related Goods and Services

Section 2(e)(2) – Primarily Geographically Descriptive:

  • TTAB Reverses Disclaimer Requirement: ANAHEIM Not Geographically Descriptive of Clothing
  • Twin TTAB Test: Is ALLEN HOTEL Confusable With ETHAN ALLEN for Lodging Services? Is it Geographically Descriptive?
  • AMERICAN VETERINARY NURSES ASSOCIATION Geographically Descriptive of Veterinary Services, Says TTAB
  • TTAB Test: Is The Design/Stylization of This USA SUPPLEMENTS Mark Inherently Distinctive? [No]

Section 2(e)(4) – Primarily Merely a Surname:

  • TTABlog Test: Is PARSONS Primarily Merely a Surname for Golf Equipment?
  • On Remand, TTAB Reverses Course and Finds EARNHARDT COLLECTION to be Primarily Merely a Surname
  • TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(4) Surname Refusal of KIPLING for Eyeglasses and Picture Frames

Section 2(f) – Acquired Distinctiveness:

  • Precedential No. 36: Applying CAFC’s Converse Factors, TTAB Finds SNOBALLS Concession Trailer Configuration Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness
  • TTAB Finds AIR NZ Legally Equivalent to Registered AIR NEW ZEALAND, Acquired Distinctiveness Overcomes Geographical Refusal

Concurrent Use:

  • TTAB Awards Junior User USA Minus Oregon in GREENFIELD Concurrent Use Proceeding

Dilution:

  • Finding Confusion and Dilution Likely, TTAB Sustains AMERICAN EXPRESS Oppositions to AMERIXPRESS

Fraud:

  • TTAB Grants Apple’s Motion to Dismiss Seven Fraud Claims and Two Others

Nonuse/Specimen of Use/Failure to Function:

  • TTAB Test: Do the Design Elements Make This Mark Eligible for Supplemental Registration? No]
  • “OUR LAWYERS ARE DOCTORS” Fails to Function as a Service Mark, Says TTAB

Misuse of ® Symbol:

  • TTAB Dismisses SUPERCORE Opposition: No Likelihood of Confusion with U-CORE and No Intent to Deceive in Misuse of the “R” Symbol

Standing:

  • Ordinary Consumer Has Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls, Says TTAB
  • Does a Law School Professor Have Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls and Toy Figures?

Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:

  • Precedential No. 35: TTAB Enters Judgment as a Sanction for Discovery Abuses and Egregious Conduct
  • Precedential No. 34: In “Expedited Cancellation” Proceeding, TTAB Denies Petition to Cancel MYST Registration for Musical Entertainment Services
  • TTAB Enters Summary Judgment Based On Issue Preclusion: District Court Decided Ownership Issue
  • Precedential No. 33: TTAB Denies Reconsideration of Untimely Motion to Compel Filed on Deadline Day for Pre-Trial Disclosures

CAFC Opinions:

  • CAFC Affirms TTAB Dismissal of Surname Oppositions to SCHLAFLY for Beer, Finding Acquired Distinctiveness
  • CAFC Vacates and Remands TTAB’s OMAHA STEAKS v. GREATER OMAHA Decision
  • CAFC Renders Split Decision in CORN THINS and RICE THINS Appeal: Affirming Mere Descriptiveness But Remanding on Genericness

Other:

  • TTAB Schedules Eleven (11) Oral Hearings for January 2019
  • TTAB Posts December 2018 Hearing Schedule
  • TTAB Posts November 2018 Hearing Schedule
  • Does a Law School Professor Have Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls and Toy Figures?
  • USPTO Proposes Rule Change Requiring Foreign Applicants Be Represented By US Licensed Attorney
  • TTAB Posts October 2018 Hearing Schedule

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2018.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

Precedential No. 37: Dismissing “NAKED” Condoms Cancellation, TTAB Finds Lack of Standing Due To Contractual Estoppel

Next

Precedential No. 38: TTAB Finds Allegations of Abandonment Legally Sufficient Under Iqbal/Twombly


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web.