LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTAB Vacates HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA Decision, Following District Court Order

March 4, 2016| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch

The Board issued an Order yesterday vacating its HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA decision, in compliance with the February 23, 2016 Order of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama [TTABlogged here]. The Director of the USPTO specifically reserved the right to seek further review of the orders and opinions of the district court in this matter. The full Order issued by the Board is set out below. The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama and Paul W. Bryant, Jr. v. William Pitts, Jr. and Christopher Blackburn, Opposition No. 91187103 (March 3, 2016) [not precedential].

HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA

Pursuant to the settlement of Opposers’ appeal, resulting in the consent judgment the parties agreed to and obtained approval of in Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Ala. v. Houndstooth Mafia Enters., LLC, No. 7:13-cv-1736-RDP (N. D. Ala.), and the district court’s February 23, 2016 order requiring the Board to vacate its July 23, 2013 opinion, that opinion is vacated. The application is remanded to the examining attorney to update the owner information to reflect the assignment of the application to the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama (recorded at Reel/Frame 5285/0632) and allow the application to proceed to registration. Opposers’ pending motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) is dismissed as moot. The Director of the USPTO specifically reserves the right to seek further review of the orders and opinions of the district court in this matter.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

Family Feud: TTAB Dismisses Opposition to EARNHARDT COLLECTION for Furniture and Home Construction

Next

TTAB Accepts Morehouse Defense! Dismisses Opposition to FB FRESH BODY for Cosmetics


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.