LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTAB Test: Which One of these Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?

February 12, 2016| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch

I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods/services, without more. Well, try your luck on these three appeals. Which one resulted in a reversal? [Answer in first comment.]

TTABlog seal

In re PTT, LLC, Serial No. 86203092 (January 21, 2015) [not precedential]. [Refusal to register WHAT I LIKE ABOUT YOU for computer game software for “machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals,” in view of the identical mark for “entertainment services in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama and animated television series” and “digital versatile discs featuring music, comedy, drama, action, adventure, and/or animation”].

51Icqx9MFVL._SX940_

In re Epic Naturals, LLC, Serial Nos. 85762427 and 85762380 (February 8, 2016) [not precedential]. [Refusals to register the marks THE EPIC SEED in standard character and design form, for “yogurt, strained yogurt, and probiotic yogurt-based beverages not for medical purposes” on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark EPIC for cheese].

THE EPIC SEED & Design

In re Fivepals, LLC, Serial No. 85924540 (February 9, 2016) [not precedential]. [Refusal to register ALICE for “Mobile communication downloadable software platform allowing hotel customers to remotely access and reserve hotel services through smartphones, and allowing hotels to track and analyze customer preferences and characteristics,” in view of the registered mark KATIE ALICE for “Hotel reservation services; restaurant reservation services; hotel restaurant reservation services; on-line booking of restaurant places (seats), including hotel restaurant places (seats); information about restaurants provided on-line from a computer data base or from the Internet; restaurant menus, including hotel restaurant menus; provided on-line from a computer data base or from the Internet; telephone booking services in respect of restaurants and hotel restaurants; information, advice and consultancy services in respect of the above; providing information via a global computer network in relation to the aforesaid services”

ALICE

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

Precedential No. 41: TTAB Refuses Reconsideration of its Denial of Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss

Next

CAFC Corrects SLANTS Opinion Regarding Cybersquatting Protection


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.