LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTAB Reverses Disclaimer Requirement: ANAHEIM Not Geographically Descriptive of Clothing

December 24, 2018January 2, 2019| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch
The TTAB reversed a refusal based on the USPTO’s requirement, under Section 6(a), that Applicant Red Flags Fly disclaim the word ANAHEIM in its mark ANAHEIM HILLBILLIES (Stylized) for various clothing items. The examining attorney maintained that ANAHEIM is primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. The Board, however, found no evidence that the goods will emanate from Anaheim, California (applicant is located in Los Angeles), and in any event, “the juxtaposition of ANAHEIM with HILLBILLIES creates an incongruity rendering Applicant’s mark unitary.” In re Red Flags Fly, Inc., Serial No. 87104371 (December 20, 2018) [not precedential] [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos).

A term is primarily geographically descriptive if (1) its primary significance is a generally known geographic location; (2) the goods or services originate in the place identified in
the mark; and (3) purchasers would likely believe that the goods or services originate in the geographic place identified by the term. The Board concluded that “at a minimum the second prong of the test has not been met.”

There was no evidence in the record that applicant’s clothing products will originate from Anaheim, California. Because the application was filed under Section 1(b), there was no specimen of use that the Board could examine. The Board observed that proper Office procedure requires the examining attorney to either (1) contact the applicant to ascertain the origin of the goods and make a note to the file, or (2) issue an information request under Trademark Rule 2.61(b), 37 C.F.R. § 2.61(b). SeeTMEP Section 1210.03.

Moreover, the Board found that “the juxtaposition of ANAHEIM with HILLBILLIES creates an incongruity rendering Applicant’s mark unitary.”

The record shows that “Anaheim” is “a city outside Los Angeles, in Southern California. It’s home to the Disneyland Resort, a massive complex of family-friendly, Disney-themed rides, restaurants, hotels and shops.” According to MacMillan Dictionary, “hillbilly” is defined as “someone who lives in the countryside, especially someone who is not well educated.” Consumers are well aware that Anaheim is not “the countryside,” and therefore likely to perceive Applicant’s mark as a sardonic reference to the city’s populace and sprawling highly developed landscape. The intricate gothic stylization of the lettering in the mark creates another point of irony.

And so the Board reversed the refusal to register.

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlog comment: As you may know, ANAHEIM HILLBILLIES is a brand created by Gwen Stefani, a native of Anaheim.

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2018.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

TTABlog Test: Is PARSONS Primarily Merely a Surname for Golf Equipment?

Next

Precedential No. 35: TTAB Enters Judgment as a Sanction for Discovery Abuses and Egregious Conduct


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.