LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

Recommended Reading: Prof. Lisa Ramsey, “Using Failure to Function Doctrine to Protect Free Speech and Competition in Trademark Law”

July 20, 2020August 17, 2020| in The TTABlog| by kerrycoughlin
In her article, “Using Failure to Function Doctrine to Protect Free Speech and Competition in Trademark Law,” Professor Lisa P. Ramsey of the University of San Diego School of Law responds to Professor Alexandra Roberts’ paper “Trademark Failure-to-Function” by following her advice “to focus more attention on whether matter claimed as a mark is actually used and perceived as a trademark that identifies and distinguishes products and indicates their source.”

I agree with her that failure to function doctrine should be used more frequently to protect free speech and competition in trademark law. Below I explain in detail how the USPTO and courts can use this trademark doctrine to safeguard the public domain—the words and symbols companies can use in connection with the advertising and sale of their products—against efforts to claim trademark rights in memes, offensive terms and symbols, words and designs commonly used in an industry, and other widely used messages and product features that were inherently valuable in the marketplace before people tried to register and protect them as trademarks.

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlogger comment: In the past year the TTAB has issued a half-dozen precedential failure-to-function decisions.

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2020.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

TTAB Reverses Section 2(a) False Connection Refusal of GIPA for Intellectual Property Services

Next

TTABlog Test: Which of These Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.