LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

Precedential No. 15: TTAB Rejects Specimens of Use for Radio Broadcast Services

June 6, 2016November 25, 2017| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch

In This Issue…

  • Precedential No. 15: TTAB Rejects Specimens of Use for Radio Broadcast Services
  • More Recent Articles
  • Search The TTABlog®

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark WORLD’S BIGGEST SMALL GROUP for radio broadcasting services (in International Class 38}, finding that applicant’s specimens of use failed to show that the phrase served as a source indicator for radio broadcasting services, as opposed to applicant’s own radio program. In re WAY Media, Inc., Serial No. 86325739 (June 3, 2016) [precedential].

worldbiggest small group

A service mark specimen of use is acceptable if it either (1) shows the mark used or displayed

as a service mark in the sale of the services, which includes use in the course of rendering or performing the services, or (2) shows the mark used or displayed as a service mark in advertising the services, which encompasses marketing and promotional materials. Here, applicant contended that its specimens of use satisfied both tests.

Applicant focused on four pages of material, including several Internet website pages referring to a radio program and YouTube screenshots that purportedly depicted the mark in a “radio broadcast booth environment.” [See picture above]. The Board noted that the TMEP provides guidance as to the meaning of “radio broadcasting services:”

“Radio broadcasting services” (Class 38) would be an appropriate identification when a radio station uses a mark, such as call letters, to indicate the source of its broadcasting services generally. On the other hand, if an applicant is using the name of a weekly comedy television show as a mark, “television broadcasting services” would not be appropriate because the mark does not serve to identify and distinguish the electrical transmission of the program. Instead, the applicant should identify the services as “television entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing series of comedy programs” (Class 41).

Here, the Board found that the phrase WORLD’S BIGGEST SMALL GROUP, as it appears on the specimens, refers to applicant’s Bible-reading and devotion program. There was no direct association in the specimens between WORLD’S BIGGEST SMALL GROUP and radio broadcasting services. In short, “[n]othing on these pages demonstrates that consumers would perceive the phrase WORLD’S BIGGEST SMALL GROUP as a source indicator for radio broadcasting services.”

And so the Board affirmed the refusal.

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlog comment: The original application also included entertainment, e-mail newsletter services, and website-related services in International Class 41 and charitable outreach services in International Class 45. Those services were divided out and the divided application proceeded to registration, based upon the same specimens of use as in this case.

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2016.

More Recent Articles

  • Free Webinar: The TTABlogger on TTAB Developments, June 14th, 12-1 PM EST
  • TTAB Test: Which of these Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?
  • USPTO Proposes Increased TTAB Fees, And Some New Ones
  • TTAB Posts June 2016 Hearing Schedule
  • TTABlog Test: Are ZEN BAKERY and ZEN DELITES Confusable for Cookies?

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

TTAB Test: Which of these Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?

Next

Ted Davis: Annual Review of U.S. Federal and State Case Law


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by SafeHouse Web.