LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTAB Posts November 2016 Hearing Schedule

November 15, 2016| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled seven (7) oral hearings for the month of November 2016. The hearings will be held in the East Wing of the Madison Building, in Alexandria, Virginia. Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.

2004sep28uspto_hq

November 3, 2016 – 10 AM: In re Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc., Serial Nos. 85945749 et al. [Refusals to register the color green as applied to a top portion of a sprinkler head and contrasting with the adjoining portion of the sprinkler head, on the ground that the proposed marks lacks acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f)]. [Isn’t it functional? What color would you want your sprinkler heads to be? – ed.].

oribt-sprinkler

November 15, 2016 – 11 AM: In re Prosser, Inc. , Serial Nos. 86425269 and 86415217 [Section 2(d) refusal to register TRUE VELOCITY for “Polymer-based center fire rifle cartridges meeting military specifications and provided solely in connection with Department of Defense, governmental and military use in automatic machine guns and semi-automatic machine guns, excluding all other ammunition, shotgun shells and shotgun shell shot” in view of the registered mark VELOCITY for “ammunition; shotgun shells; shotgun shell shot”].

true-velocity

November 15, 2016 – 2 PM: American Council on Exercise v. William John Martin, Opp. No. 91203539 [Opposition to registration of ACE WATER for drinking water on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered marks ACE and ACE AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EXERCISE for educational materials and other goods in the field of physical fitness, and on the ground of lack of bona fide intent].

ace

November 16, 2016 – 10:30 PM: In re Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc., Serial No. 86326950 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below [WINE & SPIRITS OF AMERICA DISCLAIMED], for “distributorship services in the field of wine, spirits and other alcoholic beverages” in view of the registered mark COASTAL PACIFIC FOOD DISTRIBUTORS for “Distributorship services in the field of food” [FOOD DISTRIBUTORS disclaimed].

coastal-and-pacific

November 17, 2016 – 1 PM: In re Utility Associates, Inc. , Serial No. 86389465 [Failure to disclaim the merely descriptive word BODYWORN in the mark shown below, for “Cameras; Cellular phones; Digital cameras; Microphones” and for “Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use with wireless mobile devices for use in obtaining, recording, storing and maintaining data and other records and evidence, including video and audio; Consulting services in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes; Providing information in the field of collection of evidence for forensic purposes”].

bodyworn

November 17, 2016 – 2 PM: In re Kohr Brothers, Inc., Serial No. 85430114 [Refusal to register, under Sections 1 and 45 of the Trademark Act, the mark CONEY ISLAND BOARDWALK CUSTARD for “Frozen desserts, namely, frozen custards” due to failure to file an acceptable specimen of use].

coney-island-boardwalk-custard

November 29, 2016 – 2 PM: Unilever PLC v. Technopharma Limited, Cancellation No. 92056654 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark NEW YORK FAIR AND LOVELY for “Skin soaps, skin cleansers, cosmetics” in Class 3, and for “Medicated skin creams and medicated skin lotions” in class 5, on the ground that respondent was not lawfully using the mark for the identified goods when it filed its Section 8 Declaration of Use].

ny-fair-and-lovely

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

TTAB Test: Is This Specimen Acceptable for “ELLE SCHNEIDER” for Video Production and Script Writing Services?

Next

CAFC Reverses TTAB: In-state Sale of Two Hats Constitutes Use of Mark in Commerce


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.